Testing And Ranking
Writing about testing in the last post makes me think of my first Aikido teacher, the late Rocky Izumi Sensei. I met him when he was teaching at the City University of Hong Kong. Like many Aikido teachers, wherever he lived, if there was not already an Aikido club, he would always start one. He was very active on Aikido forums. Years ago, he wrote an insightful article on the subject. I would like to take this opportunity to share it with you.
************************************
A test or ranking is not just for the person taking the rank test. It is as much for the rest of the Dojo, the Sensei, and newbies who don’t know the people in the Dojo.
There are several reasons for testing. One of these reasons is to show newer people what they need to learn, to provide a standard for them. Another is to show the Sensei how you perform under stress. Another is to give a belt rank that allows newbies to know what rank you are so that they can go to you for help. These are just a few of the reasons.
Why should someone NOT stop taking tests? Well, it becomes very embarrassing for the people who have taken rank tests to have someone who is lower ranked be technically and conceptually better than them. However, if a person hasn’t taken rank when then should have, then the person does not deserve it yet since the person does not yet understand the importance of ranking for the benefit of the whole Dojo. Interesting, if a person will not take rank tests, then they don’t deserve the rank yet. I have recently had to deal with this problem here in Hong Kong. The person thought they were being very humble but after looking deeply into his motivations, he realized that rather than being humble, he was being very arrogant. All those of you who are not taking rank test to remain humble, please review your motivations carefully, they may not be as pure as you think. I know since I once looked at things in the same way myself.
In Hong Kong, we give tests in front of a Board. As a member of the Board, I am not concerned only with how the individual performs in the exam, but their long-term performance in day-to-day practice. I think all of us have had instances when we are at seminars and a Sensei is standing next to us watching our technique and there is no way that you can do the technique correctly even though it is normally your favourite and best technique. In fact, you were probably doing it quite well while the Sensei was not looking but you foul up as soon as you feel his or her eyes upon you. This is why our tests are usually at the end of a period of practice during which I have a chance to watch the testees practicing their technique.
Second, the spirit of the Aikidoist is important. Does the person help others? Does the person understand the principles behind the techniques? Does the person have good Dojo Reigi? Will I be embarrassed if this person visits another Dojo? Does the person have good ukemi? Does the person practice vigorously with commitment? Do they have good zanshin? What is their mindset as they test? Will the person keep going even when the chips are down?
Third, what is the person capable of? Are they working to their limits (part of the spirit question maybe)? How is their progress?
Fourth, will conferring the higher rank improve their Aikido through improvement of their confidence? Maybe the person needs some help to stop worrying about the test so they can get on with their practicing and learning?
Fifth, what is their commitment to Aikido? How often do they come to practice? How often do they ask questions? Are they thinking about Aikido all the time.
Sixth, what is their potential? Am I wasting my time on this person? Are they only looking for rank or are they truly interesting in getting a chance to learn more advanced techniques? Why are they testing?
Seventh, how is this person’s Aikido relative to the others in the Dojo with whom they practice? This is the equity question relative to others in the Dojo or association or federation. This question should not be answered only in terms of technique but also time spent in Aikido, the amount of work the person does for Aikido (including administrative work), and the visibility of the person in the Dojo.
Eighth, how is the power of this person’s techniques? After all, this is a MARTIAL ART! What is the martial competence of the person?
Ninth, will conferring the higher rank do anything for Aikido as a whole or for the Dojo or association/federation? Will the person be a good ambassador for Aikido to outsiders? Will the person help to make Aikido grow?
There are probably a few other issues I have forgotten at present. The list is not in any specific order, especially since depending upon the specific case-by-case circumstances, which issue is most important will differ. All of these issues, though, must be balanced off. No one issue ever disappears off the list. Things just change in weighting and there is no weighting of zero.
Please note that these are my own personal criteria and are not necessarily that of any others.
By the way, these criteria hold whether the ranking is for Mudansha or Yudansha.
Rock
************************************
A test or ranking is not just for the person taking the rank test. It is as much for the rest of the Dojo, the Sensei, and newbies who don’t know the people in the Dojo.
There are several reasons for testing. One of these reasons is to show newer people what they need to learn, to provide a standard for them. Another is to show the Sensei how you perform under stress. Another is to give a belt rank that allows newbies to know what rank you are so that they can go to you for help. These are just a few of the reasons.
Why should someone NOT stop taking tests? Well, it becomes very embarrassing for the people who have taken rank tests to have someone who is lower ranked be technically and conceptually better than them. However, if a person hasn’t taken rank when then should have, then the person does not deserve it yet since the person does not yet understand the importance of ranking for the benefit of the whole Dojo. Interesting, if a person will not take rank tests, then they don’t deserve the rank yet. I have recently had to deal with this problem here in Hong Kong. The person thought they were being very humble but after looking deeply into his motivations, he realized that rather than being humble, he was being very arrogant. All those of you who are not taking rank test to remain humble, please review your motivations carefully, they may not be as pure as you think. I know since I once looked at things in the same way myself.
In Hong Kong, we give tests in front of a Board. As a member of the Board, I am not concerned only with how the individual performs in the exam, but their long-term performance in day-to-day practice. I think all of us have had instances when we are at seminars and a Sensei is standing next to us watching our technique and there is no way that you can do the technique correctly even though it is normally your favourite and best technique. In fact, you were probably doing it quite well while the Sensei was not looking but you foul up as soon as you feel his or her eyes upon you. This is why our tests are usually at the end of a period of practice during which I have a chance to watch the testees practicing their technique.
Second, the spirit of the Aikidoist is important. Does the person help others? Does the person understand the principles behind the techniques? Does the person have good Dojo Reigi? Will I be embarrassed if this person visits another Dojo? Does the person have good ukemi? Does the person practice vigorously with commitment? Do they have good zanshin? What is their mindset as they test? Will the person keep going even when the chips are down?
Third, what is the person capable of? Are they working to their limits (part of the spirit question maybe)? How is their progress?
Fourth, will conferring the higher rank improve their Aikido through improvement of their confidence? Maybe the person needs some help to stop worrying about the test so they can get on with their practicing and learning?
Fifth, what is their commitment to Aikido? How often do they come to practice? How often do they ask questions? Are they thinking about Aikido all the time.
Sixth, what is their potential? Am I wasting my time on this person? Are they only looking for rank or are they truly interesting in getting a chance to learn more advanced techniques? Why are they testing?
Seventh, how is this person’s Aikido relative to the others in the Dojo with whom they practice? This is the equity question relative to others in the Dojo or association or federation. This question should not be answered only in terms of technique but also time spent in Aikido, the amount of work the person does for Aikido (including administrative work), and the visibility of the person in the Dojo.
Eighth, how is the power of this person’s techniques? After all, this is a MARTIAL ART! What is the martial competence of the person?
Ninth, will conferring the higher rank do anything for Aikido as a whole or for the Dojo or association/federation? Will the person be a good ambassador for Aikido to outsiders? Will the person help to make Aikido grow?
There are probably a few other issues I have forgotten at present. The list is not in any specific order, especially since depending upon the specific case-by-case circumstances, which issue is most important will differ. All of these issues, though, must be balanced off. No one issue ever disappears off the list. Things just change in weighting and there is no weighting of zero.
Please note that these are my own personal criteria and are not necessarily that of any others.
By the way, these criteria hold whether the ranking is for Mudansha or Yudansha.
Rock
Comments
Post a Comment